MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín, 1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 10:48
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-6800K-$443
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
79.9% Very good
SC Int 100
SC Float 86.8
SC Mixed 104
78% 97.1 Pts
QC Int 373
QC Float 427
QC Mixed 384
89% 395 Pts
MC Int 701
MC Float 854
MC Mixed 799
117% 785 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
MSI(1462 8099) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 5.9
2% 5.47 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.4
2% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$249
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 256 145 258 188 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 461
Write 80.9
Mixed 251
SusWrite 219
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 41.1
145% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 113
83% 105 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 127%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$289
1GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 439
Write 431
Mixed 286
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 35.2
133% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 100
119% 204 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$249
72GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 353 415 432 150 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 416
Mixed 350
SusWrite 303
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 49
151% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 258
203% 278 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 127%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$296
144GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 322 318 85 68 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 467
Mixed 414
SusWrite 200
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 43.1
154% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 167
155% 236 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 125%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$474
614GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 168 170 170 170 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 222
Mixed 106
SusWrite 170
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
404% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$316
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
108% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 39.4
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $1,123
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $245AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback