PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z170-A (all builds) |
Memory | 24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161129 |
Uptime | 5.5 Days |
Run Date | Aug 10 '18 at 05:17 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 903 859 885 664 605 MB/s
|
200%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 391 400 412 417 415 MB/s
|
93.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
764GB free
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 376 312 303 299 294 MB/s
|
98.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1913 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 3,882x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 2,376x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 635x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1,316x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 808x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 737x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $655 |