Asus P8Z77-V LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LK  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 03:30
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 169
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 410
45% 354 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 95.9
Parallax 80.6
55% 81.4 fps
MRender 85.4
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 87.4
69% 84.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 60%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 89 74 80 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 173
Write 83
Mixed 164
SusWrite 79.4
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 27.4
94% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 25.8
31% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44%
Great: 80%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
54GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 224 222 127 126 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.9% Very good
Read 243
Write 228
Mixed 215
SusWrite 172
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 42.9
140% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 144
117% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
112GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 93 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 111
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 92.1
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 76%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 1TB
452GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 54
Write 53.8
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 55.9
70% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 36%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$22
14GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 90.2
Write 22
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 22.3
40% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
45% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LK Builds (Compare 2,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LK - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $472
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback