Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 11:24
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$370
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
SC Int 85.5
SC Float 90.6
SC Mixed 79.1
68% 85.1 Pts
QC Int 430
QC Float 439
QC Mixed 443
99% 438 Pts
MC Int 873
MC Float 934
MC Mixed 917
136% 908 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980 Ti-$550
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 322
Reflection 294
Parallax 322
100% 313 fps
Gravity 290
Splatting 200
108% 245 fps
Poor: 54% Great: 113%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$330
48GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 360 366 61 50 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 418
Mixed 357
SusWrite 216
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 49.6
166% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 251
210% 306 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 126%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 151 170 178 175 175 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.5% Below average
Read 128
Write 180
Mixed 162
SusWrite 168
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 6.5
40% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 96.5
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 21.2
37% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$188
29GB free
Firmware: X35510RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 116 104 117 134 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 335
Write 333
Mixed 272
SusWrite 127
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 38.6
139% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 70.6
92% 170 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 104%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$65
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 111 113 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 101
Write 98.7
Mixed 61
SusWrite 111
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 67%
SRT USB 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 12 12 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 4.3
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 10.7
15% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$171
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
70.2% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 24.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $329Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i7-7700K $360AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback