HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180214
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '18 at 07:37
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 170 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 334 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1494) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%
ATI HD 3650 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 2% AMD(1002 0B42) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.07% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.59 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.07% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 433 383 173 135 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 464 Write 412 Mixed 343 SusWrite 282 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 37.4 120% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 349 263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 4TB 730GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 123 124 124 125 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 84.3 Write 73 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 123 64% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s

Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 32GB-$102 362 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 6GB free, PID 168e Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 26 26 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 22 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 25.7 33% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 67% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 4x4GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.1 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	684x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	591x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16