Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '18 at 23:07
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 75.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 256 86% 157 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 926 84% 706 Pts	64-Core 1,399 87% 1,399 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 33 Reflection 38 Parallax 30.8 27% 33.9 fps	MRender 47.1 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 43 34% 41 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1579 1049 616 617 619 620 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	252% Outstanding	Read 1,998 Write 1,819 Mixed 1,304 SusWrite 850 334% 1,493 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 65.6 228% 80.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1294 DQ Write 963 DQ Mixed 1,094 827% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 252% Great: 340%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 223GB free Firmware: UF360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 151 144 148 146 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 415 Write 352 Mixed 266 SusWrite 180 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 13.7 67% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 94 DQ Mixed 40.1 48% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.4% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 12.8 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 9.6 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 101%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	16x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	11x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	17x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	5x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GBCorsairBench 198%, 36,473 samples	8x
860 Pro 1TBSamsung $300Bench 112%, 8,179 samples	5x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	4x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	29x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	11x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $860

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16