PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171221 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Aug 08 '18 at 14:20 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
91.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 228 228 223 219 219 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 device 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 179 181 181 181 182 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 121 122 121 107 MB/s
|
64.8%
Good
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
419GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 39 38 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 2,910x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 265x |
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples | 260x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 867x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 356x |
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 261x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $1,262 |