Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Performance (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130703
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '18 at 13:26
Run Duration	346 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 220 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 384 44% 344 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 103 97 92 93 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 297 Write 157 Mixed 200 SusWrite 100 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 40.7 145% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 145 121% 174 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 87%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 101 96 93 92 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 254 Write 128 Mixed 180 SusWrite 94 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 29 120% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 81.6 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 104 79% 104 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 9GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 123 131 120 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 141 Write 116 Mixed 71 SusWrite 119 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 114%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 21GB free Firmware: CP100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 47 49 47 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 43 Write 24.8 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 48 28% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 43%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 162GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 37.2 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 37.9 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 44%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB 811 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 545GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 162 173 160 172 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 50.3 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 167 123% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 65% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 72%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB 811 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 152GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 157 155 156 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 144 Write 122 Mixed 63 SusWrite 156 161% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 77,652 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.5% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 18.7 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

CPU
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	65x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	63x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	12x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 49%, 25 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16