Biostar A960D+V2

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A960D+V2 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151125
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '18 at 03:33
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 83 1-Core 55.1 2-Core 86.9 50% 75 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 330 31% 259 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 36.1 32% 34.8 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 35.1 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-128G-1006 128GB 782 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2180306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 97 94 101 100 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.5% Average	Read 216 Write 189 Mixed 152 SusWrite 95.7 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 44 4K Mixed 26.7 93% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 64.9 DQ Mixed 33 29% 42 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 94%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 249GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 98 94 101 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 99.7 Write 89.5 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 97 64% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 60%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 106 107 110 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 110 Write 101 Mixed 56 SusWrite 108 68% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 12.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A960D+V2 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V2

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	26x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	18x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	14x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	13x

SSD
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	3x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	3x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	35x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	11x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16