Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIntel SandyBridge Platform
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '18 at 18:20
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 493
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1601 MHz, MLim: 1787 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 75.2
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 66.8
61% 72.5 fps
MRender 76.7
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 59.6
55% 68.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$33
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 160 159 165 158 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 172
Mixed 76
SusWrite 161
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96%
Great: 103%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
101GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 58 59 58 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 79
Write 80.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 57.8
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 52%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
646GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 118 122 120 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 119
Write 105
Mixed 57
SusWrite 120
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51272BD160B.M18F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback