Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$84 2,640 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 48.2 1-Core 28 2-Core 42.2 27% 39.5 Pts	4-Core 53.8 8-Core 53.1 7% 53.4 Pts	64-Core 52.7 3% 52.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6100 335 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 1017) 32MB Ram: 32MB, Driver: 307.83 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.11% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.15 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.11% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75 15,430 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 87 86 93 81 79 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.6% Below average	Read 187 Write 127 Mixed 140 SusWrite 87.4 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 18.7 48% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 71.5 DQ Write 69.5 DQ Mixed 41.8 39% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.27% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 0.6 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.63 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.27% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16