| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150714 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 05 '18 at 20:04 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 63% |
PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
41.8%
Average
|
44% 77.5 Pts
|
31% 240 Pts
|
17% 269 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Asus(1043 8477) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.59
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
14% 18.9 fps
|
14% 18.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 50 72 76 65 85 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
42% 58.5 MB/s
|
55% 0.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
42.4%
Average
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
24% 8.47 GB/s
|
22% 186 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 532 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 217x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 131x |
| Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 72x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples | 59x |
| GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples | 46x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 45x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $222 |