Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 100% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '18 at 23:39
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 91.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 250 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 789 79% 643 Pts	64-Core 1,018 63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8591) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 145 Parallax 136 110% 139 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 130 Splatting 107 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$46 33,719 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 364GB free (System drive) Firmware: AADA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 487 432 465 444 440 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 1,736 Write 745 Mixed 850 SusWrite 457 209% 947 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 57.7 211% 76.6 MB/s	DQ Read 633 DQ Write 516 DQ Mixed 345 321% 498 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 216%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 320GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 259 243 281 284 280 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 429 Mixed 377 SusWrite 304 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 39.1 140% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 197 191% 300 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB-$82 1,785 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 48.4 MC Write 43.9 MC Mixed 36.5 123% 42.9 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 40.3 SC Mixed 28.9 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16