T-systems PC P5LD2-VM

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	T-systems PC P5LD2-VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P5LD2-VM
Memory	1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '16 at 16:35
Run Duration	383 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz 6,937 User benchmarks, average bench 29% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 51.1 1-Core 24.3 2-Core 33 26% 36.1 Pts	4-Core 31.1 8-Core 33 4% 32 Pts	64-Core 30.5 2% 30.5 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 853B) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.07 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.04 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5084008 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 72730976198837 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1226 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 77 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 44 94492164127 (C2) HDA temperature 31 44 94492164127 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5084008 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5084008 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5084008 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9707 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3609 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3609 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3625	33.4% Below average	Read 194 Write 134 Mixed 121 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 10.6 54% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 40.8 DQ Mixed 11.5 14% 24 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 87%
Maxtor STM3160813AS 160GB 1,148 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 16GB free Firmware: MC1J Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 50967621 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4471 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 88916811 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 23706 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3172 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 555483169 (C2) HDA temperature 33 46 81604378657 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 42 21 50967621 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -67598490249351 (F1) Unknown 100 253 424618860 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1131490746	35.5% Below average	Read 60.3 Write 63.2 Mixed 62.1 47% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.41 103% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 66%
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 6GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 88 222477779 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5121 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 746944431 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 31637 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3766 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 52 656605223 (C2) HDA temperature 39 48 77309411367 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 87 48 183734882 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29.5% Poor	Read 51.5 Write 51.1 Mixed 50.3 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.35 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.44% Terrible	Read 26.1 Write 4.27 Mixed 6.48 12% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.04 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.003 12% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.44% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 512, 1024, 512 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.7 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PC P5LD2-VM Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: T-systems PC P5LD2-VM

CPU
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	1x

RAM
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16