Asrock Z170 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '18 at 09:31
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 520
67% 506 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 102
Parallax 79.2
83% 94.2 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 100
Splatting 103
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 308 214 192 184 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 485
Mixed 370
SusWrite 255
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 61.2
207% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 114 113 116 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 114
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
120GB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 168 165 168 169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 109
Write 122
Mixed 51
SusWrite 167
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST1000LM002-9VQ14L 1TB
205GB free
Firmware: CC96
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 63 36 63 50 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 36
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 51.5
32% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 48%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
83GB free
Firmware: 05.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 81 82 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 58
Write 56.7
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 81.7
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 76%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
53GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 91 92 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 116
Write 104
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 92.1
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 24.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Pro4 Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Pro4 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $450
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback