Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
12 days ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 16:58
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
SC Int 118
SC Float 129
SC Mixed 124
99% 124 Pts
QC Int 468
QC Float 518
QC Mixed 495
112% 493 Pts
MC Int 1,348
MC Float 1,406
MC Mixed 1,389
207% 1,381 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 106%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$529
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Lighting 222
Reflection 162
Parallax 291
76% 225 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 186
Splatting 185
70% 168 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$339
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 901 894 898 892 868 868 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,048
Write 910
Mixed 693
SusWrite 887
250% 1,134 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 58.2
236% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 377
344% 544 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 236%
Great: 242%
Amd-raid Array 3 239GB
154GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 98 98 100 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 723
Write 326
Mixed 381
SusWrite 99.2
84% 382 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 32.4
126% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 141
121% 174 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid Array 4 119GB
111GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 107 106 109 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
Read 313
Write 134
Mixed 167
SusWrite 107
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 21
74% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 46.8
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 61.5
53% 74.8 MB/s
Amd-raid ST1000VM002-1ET1 1TB
425GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 88 89 92 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
Read 47
Write 138
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 88.5
56% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Amd-raid WDC WD5000AAKX-7 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 77 74 73 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
Read 119
Write 91
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 74.4
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 45%
Patriot Supersonic Pulse USB 3.0 16GB-$30
15GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.63% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 12.8
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 10.6
17% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
32% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.63%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB M378A5143DB0-CPB M378A5143DB0-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB 16GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 32.2
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 29.3
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,041
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $172SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback