Asrock H110M-HDS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '18 at 14:38
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4500-$37 3,191 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 224 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 220 30% 222 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 0462) 1GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 14.4 0% 9.02 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 13.9 10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: VT100-49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 36 28 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 51.8 Write 58.8 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 39.4 34% 46.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 38%
CCR-70 1GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID e0ed Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.2 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.11% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 4.8 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 5.5 9% 7.95 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.11% Great: 4%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 157GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 35 36 35 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 36.4 Write 36 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 35.5 48% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB 30,824 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	123x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	101x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	19x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	25x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16