Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 198 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 537 54% 441 Pts	64-Core 559 35% 559 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 11F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.75% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 6.66 6% 14.6 fps	MRender 9.19 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 14.3 9% 9.99 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.75% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1296 1319 1366 1381 1232 921 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	248% Outstanding	Read 1,678 Write 1,303 Mixed 833 SusWrite 1,252 283% 1,267 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 61.9 218% 78.6 MB/s	DQ Read 903 DQ Write 771 DQ Mixed 841 629% 838 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 248% Great: 292%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 651GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 111 109 108 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	56% Above average	Read 87.2 Write 89.1 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 107 66% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 158% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 72%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.5 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.1 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 99.8 Write 27.5 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 6.1 34% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 64% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB 20,148 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 21.9 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 22.1 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	31x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	19x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA 128GBThnsn5128gpu7Bench 139%, 3,510 samples	10x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	5x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	3x

RAM
MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 71%, 20,148 samples	18x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 18,452 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 41%, 687 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16