Asrock Z97X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97X Killer  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 03:43
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 90
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 267
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gainward(10B0 1180) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1575 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 51.4
35% 44.2 fps
MRender 51.5
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 36
36% 45.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 190 142 108 89 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 412
Write 245
Mixed 270
SusWrite 138
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 42.8
165% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 149
142% 223 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 93%
SanDisk Extreme 480GB-$300
395GB free
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 186 194 186 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 476
Write 268
Mixed 288
SusWrite 188
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 24.7
87% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 105
92% 141 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 66%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
61GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 55 61 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 59
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 60.4
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
159GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 66 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 80
Write 43.7
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 67.9
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
151% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 76%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
25GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 89 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 77
SusWrite 89.4
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 17.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97X Killer Builds (Compare 687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97X Killer - $195

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $873
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback