| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68C-GS FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120118 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 02 '18 at 19:51 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 81% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
|
28.2%
Poor
|
29% 43.6 Pts
|
7% 53.1 Pts
|
4% 69.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Asus(1043 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
0.66%
Terrible
|
0% 1.26 fps
|
1% 1.35 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 83 81 39 13 80 MB/s
|
22.8%
Poor
|
29% 38 MB/s
|
195% 1.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CM2X2048-6400C5 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 266 MHz
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
10% 3.47 GB/s
|
7% 2.6 GB/s
|
24% 168 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 21x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 17x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 9x |
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 8x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $75 |