PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7758 |
Motherboard | MSI Z77A-G43 (MS-7758) (all builds) |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120619 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '18 at 21:31 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 62% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 59 57 46 44 41 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
409GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 116 118 120 118 MB/s
|
70.3%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
40.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 479x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 344x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 248x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 141x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 135x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 124x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $280 |