TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus STRIKER II FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus STRIKER II FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '18 at 14:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 109
55% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 218
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 64.1%
 Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 1225 MHz, MLim: 1640 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 52.4
34% 44.4 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 48.7
34% 40.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 33.7%
 Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 199 201 202 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 245
Write 201
Mixed 207
SusWrite 198
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 35.5
116% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 41.5
DQ Write 90.2
DQ Mixed 50.7
43% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 61.2%
 Great: 89%
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB
271GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 31.5
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 32.6
41% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 15.4%
 Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 22.7%
 Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical STRIKER II FORMULA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus STRIKER II FORMULA

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9650Intel  $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples6x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel  $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples4x
Xeon X5460Intel  $190Bench 52%, 10,360 samples3x
GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples3x
GTX 670Nvidia  $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples2x
SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 69%, 17 samples2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples1x
RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples13x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $942
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback