Real World Speed
Performance profile from 721,823 user samples
627,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Worst Bench: 48% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 123rd / 714
94,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 32% XFX(1682 9470)
Poor: 32% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 150th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
52 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
39.5 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
63.8 fps Much better lighting effects.
+34%
47.5 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
68.3 fps Better reflection handling.
+21%
56.5 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.2 fps Faster multi rendering.
+14%
57.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
66 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+20%
55.2 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
68.7 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+14%
60.1 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
96.2 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+61%
59.9 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.5 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+13%
60.7 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
70.3 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+9%
64.6 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
150 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+7%
140 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+17%
84 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
64 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+21%
53 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
60 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+22%
49 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
148 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+12%
132 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
100 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+14%
88 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+12%
49 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
51 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+7%
48 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
184 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+68%
109 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
116 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+20%
96 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
61 Fps Better WoW Fps.
+22%
50 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+16%
82 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,450,169 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.94 % Hugely higher market share.
+527%
0.15 %
Value
Value For Money
103 % Much better value.
+39%
74.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
62 %
Price
Price (score)
$119 Slightly cheaper.
+5%
$126
Age
Newest
92 Months 92 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
66.6 fps 80.2 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
65.1 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+48%
44.1 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
60.7 fps 69.5 fps Better texture detail.
+14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
60.2 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+43%
42.2 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only have three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback