Speed test your PC in less than a minute.
248,883 Components     18,255,637 Benchmarks     1,884,935 Votes

Intel Core i7-7700K $309

The Core i7-7700K is Intel’s flagship Kaby Lake based CPU which is reported to have the same IPC as its predecessor, Skylake. Comparing the 7700K and 6700K shows that both average effective speed and peak overclocked speed are up by 7%. Most of the increase in average effective speed is explained by the 5% boost in base clocks from 4.0 to 4.2 GHz. The improved peak lab speed is attributable to a combination of better overclocking capacity and improvements in Intel’s speedshift technology which make the 7700K slightly more responsive. Kaby Lake also has marginally better HD 630 integrated graphics. The i7-7700K is priced similarly to the i7-6700K so for top end gaming and workstation builds, the 7700K is the clear choice for 2017. AMD’s Ryzen will release later this year so things could change at that time. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

AMD RX 480 $210

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $127

The 256GB Samsung 850 Pro is the fastest consumer SSD we have seen to date. Thanks to Samsung's new 3D V-NAND the 850 Pro has lower power consumption and better performance, albeit marginally, than both the 840 Evo and 840 Pro. Looking at the benchmark figures for the 840 and 850 Pros shows that the effective performance improvement is 10% whereas the 850 Pro beats the 840 Evo by 16%. These drives effectively saturate SATA 3.0 making it difficult to distinguish between them in day-to-day use. At current prices the 850 Pro is prohibitively expensive, prices need to drop by 15% before it approaches the 840 Pro from a value perspective. Samsung may release a value orientated 850 Evo soon, but for now "most" users are better off with the 840 Pro. [Oct '14 SSDrivePro]

Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $102

The 250GB Samsung 850 Evo has a similar architecture to its hugely successful predecessor, the 840 Evo. Both drives are TLC based but the 850 uses 3D V-NAND as opposed to regular NAND. Both drives also feature a Turbowrite cache (TWC) which buffers up to 3GB of writes. The TWC enables high burst write speeds but when the cache exhausts write speeds drop to 300 MB/s. Comparing the 850 and 840 Evos shows that effective speed, has improved by 11% and the warranty has been extended from three to five years but prices are also up by 11%. The 850 Evo does put in superb benchmarks (second only to the 850 Pro) but these are only valid within the TWC. At current price levels the 850 Evo struggles to compete with the value leaders[Dec '14 SSDrivePro]

Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85

The new 3TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST3000DM008) replaces its hugely successful predecessor, the 3TB Barracuda 7200.14 2011 (ST3000DM001). Comparing performance between the two models shows that the newer drive has 12% faster sequential speeds, comparable 4K speeds, improved mixed sequential speed and reduced mixed 4K speed. Overall, the effective speed is 12% faster on the 2016 model. Since there is normally little price difference between the two models the 2016 version is the clear winner especially for use as a backup drive with its impressive sequential read and write speeds of nearly 200 MBps. See the current value leaders here[Feb '17 HDrivePro]

Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50

The 1TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST1000DM010) has an impressive performance profile. With Sequential read/writes averaging 173 and 159 MBps respectively, the Barracuda can make short work of even moderately large backups. The small file (4K) performance profile is less impressive but still adequate with average read/writes coming in at 0.87 and 1.53 MBps respectively. For use as OS drives, rotational disks are quickly loosing market share to SSDs which offer orders of magnitude faster 4k read/write speeds. On the other hand cheap TLC based SSDs often have slower sustained write speeds than their rotational counterparts. Reasonably good overall performance can be achieved by using a TLC SSD to host the OS and a larger rotational drive such as the Barracuda for backups and media files. Larger capacity variants of this drive offer both better performance and better value for money. [Feb '17 HDrivePro]

Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 60GB $68

The Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 has a Sandforce controller coupled with MLC NAND. This combination produces mediocre results for an SSD but for a USB flash drive its small file 4K performance is staggering. Comparing the Ventura Ultra and Sandisk Extreme shows that for small file IO the Ventura is around 200% faster than the Extreme. The Extreme has faster peak write speeds but overall the Ultra leads by a whopping 72%. The Ultra is a great choice for hosting Operating Systems or for use as boot media (check mobo. compat.) where its small file performance and low access times will reduce load times by orders of magnitude. Thanks to its exceptionally reasonable pricing, the Ultra topples the Extreme as my top USB pick for both value for money AND overall performance. [May '14 USBFlashPro]

SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB $23

The benchmark scores for the SanDisk Extreme were stunning. Until now every flash drive we have tested has shown a serious weakness in the area of 4K random writes. The SanDisk Extreme achieved a 4K random write speed of 2.1 MB/s which was over three times faster than the best of the rest, unfortunately we were unable to get consistent measurements but 2.1 MB/s was towards at the lower end of the range (10.8 MB/s - 1.71 MB/s) we observed. We suspect the inconsistency relates to the way the controller batches page cleanup. The other benchmark observations were all consistent and to date this drive has the highest sequential read we have seen on a 16GB flash drive. The SanDisk Extreme has not been released in the UK. Our test unit had to be shipped from Hong Kong where we were able to purchase it at at an extremely reasonable price. We will update the price if/when the drive becomes officially available in the UK ... [Jul '12 USBFlashPro]
3,790,378 PCs tested.


1 secs agoMSI MS-179BDestroyer54%
6 secs agoAsrock P67 Pro3Yacht68%
10 secs agoMSI Z87-G41 PC Mate(MS-7850)Gunboat78%
10 secs agoAsrock B250M Pro4Battleship62%
12 secs agoAsus B85M-ETree trunk53%
19 secs agoMicrosoft Surface Pro 4Yacht87%
40 secs agoAsus PRIME Z270-AAircraft carrier59%
50 secs agoAsus MAXIMUS VIII IMPACTTree trunk59%
1 min agoAsrock Z77 Pro4-MYacht56%
1 min agoAsus P8H61-M LX2Jet ski42%
1 min agoLenovo 20378Speed boat16%
1 min agoDell Inspiron 5559Speed boat95%
1 min agoMSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)UFO89%
1 min agoMSI B150M PRO-VH (MS-7996)Battle cruiser26%
1 min agoAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0Gunboat55%
1 min agoAsus GL553VDBattleship73%
2 mins agoAsus N550JVGunboat88%
2 mins agoGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CFYacht54%
2 mins agoMSI H170 GAMING M3 (MS-7978)Surfboard34%
2 mins agoAsus PRIME Z270-ANuclear submarine59%


  Intel Core i5-6600KGBR-User, 2 secs ago.
  AMD RX 470BRA-User, 1 min ago.
  AMD R9 380USA-User, 1 min ago.
  Nvidia GTX 1060-6GBUSA-User, 1 min ago.
  Nvidia GTX 1050THA-User, 1 min ago.
  Nvidia GTX 1050 TiRUS-User, 2 mins ago.
  AMD Ryzen 5 1600XCAN-User, 3 mins ago.
  Intel Core i7-5930KBGR-User, 4 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 750 TiSWE-User, 4 mins ago.
  Intel Core i5-6500RUS-User, 5 mins ago.
  Intel Core i5-7500RUS-User, 5 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 550-TiAUT-User, 5 mins ago.
  AMD Ryzen 5 1400GBR-User, 6 mins ago.
  Intel Core i5-2500KUSA-User, 6 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 1080 TiUSA-User, 9 mins ago.
  AMD Ryzen 5 1400TUR-User, 10 mins ago.
  Intel Core i7-7700KBEL-User, 10 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 980 TiROU-User, 10 mins ago.

New Products

›  AMD RX 560GPUPro, 2 hrs ago.
›  AMD RX 550GPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD RX 570GPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD RX 580GPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1400CPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1500XCPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1600XCPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1600CPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  Nvidia GTX 1080 TiGPUPro, 2 months ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1700CPUPro, 2 months ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1800XCPUPro, 2 months ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1700XCPUPro, 3 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 1TBSSDrivePro, 3 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 512GBSSDrivePro, 3 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 256GBSSDrivePro, 3 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 128GBSSDrivePro, 3 months ago.
›  WD Blue 6TB (2015)HDrivePro, 3 months ago.
›  Barracuda 500GB (2016)HDrivePro, 3 months ago.
›  WD Black 4TB (2016)HDrivePro, 3 months ago.
The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $102
Intel Core i5-7600K $240AMD RX 480 $210Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $127
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $167
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback