Speed test your PC in less than a minute.
206,472 Components     13,953,525 Benchmarks     1,551,850 Votes

Intel Core i7-7700K $310

The Core i7-7700K is Intel’s flagship Kaby Lake based CPU which is reported to have the same IPC as its predecessor, Skylake. Comparing the 7700K and 6700K shows that both average effective speed and peak overclocked speed are up by 7%. Most of the increase in average effective speed is explained by the 5% boost in base clocks from 4.0 to 4.2 GHz. The improved peak lab speed is attributable to a combination of better overclocking capacity and improvements in Intel’s speedshift technology which make the 7700K slightly more responsive. Kaby Lake also has marginally better HD 630 integrated graphics. The i7-7700K is priced similarly to the i7-6700K so for top end gaming and workstation builds, the 7700K is the clear choice for 2017. AMD’s Ryzen architecture is due for release later this year so things could change at that time. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

Intel Core i5-7600K $240

The i5-7600K targets high end gamers, it sits just behind the flagship i7-7700K in Intel’s Kaby Lake lineup. The 7600K will likely be the most popular gaming CPU of 2017 (some competition from AMD’s upcoming Zen/Ryzen CPUs, would be very welcome). Comparing the 7600K and 6600K shows that the two processors are very closely matched and comparing the 7600K vs the hyper-threaded 7700K highlights the relative strength of the 7700K for workstation performance. There are no significant architectural differences between Kaby Lake and Skylake so, when fully overclocked, the two generations should perform similarly but Kaby Lake offers faster base clocks, improved speed shift technology which helps CPU responsiveness, and better integrated graphics[Jan '17 CPUPro]

Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

AMD RX 470 $165

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121

The 256GB Samsung 850 Pro is the fastest consumer SSD we have seen to date. Thanks to Samsung's new 3D V-NAND the 850 Pro has lower power consumption and better performance, albeit marginally, than both the 840 Evo and 840 Pro. Looking at the benchmark figures for the 840 and 850 Pros shows that the effective performance improvement is 10% whereas the 850 Pro beats the 840 Evo by 16%. These drives effectively saturate SATA 3.0 making it difficult to distinguish between them in day-to-day use. At current prices the 850 Pro is prohibitively expensive, prices need to drop by 15% before it approaches the 840 Pro from a value perspective. Samsung may release a value orientated 850 Evo soon, but for now "most" users are better off with the 840 Pro. [Oct '14 SSDrivePro]

Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94

The 250GB Samsung 850 Evo has a similar architecture to its hugely successful predecessor, the 840 Evo. Both drives are TLC based but the 850 uses 3D V-NAND as opposed to regular NAND. Both drives also feature a Turbowrite cache (TWC) which buffers up to 3GB of writes. The TWC enables high burst write speeds but when the cache exhausts write speeds drop to 300 MB/s. Comparing the 850 and 840 Evos shows that effective speed, has improved by 11% and the warranty has been extended from three to five years but prices are also up by 11%. The 850 Evo does put in superb benchmarks (second only to the 850 Pro) but these are only valid within the TWC. At current price levels the 850 Evo struggles to compete with the value leaders[Dec '14 SSDrivePro]

Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90

The new 3TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST3000DM008) replaces its hugely successful predecessor, the 3TB Barracuda 7200.14 2011 (ST3000DM001). Comparing performance between the two models shows that the newer drive has 12% faster sequential speeds, comparable 4K speeds, improved mixed sequential speed and reduced mixed 4K speed. Overall, the effective speed is 12% faster on the 2016 model. Since there is normally little price difference between the two models the 2016 version is the clear winner especially for use as a backup drive with its impressive sequential read and write speeds of nearly 200 MBps. See the current value leaders here[Feb '17 HDrivePro]

Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50

The 1TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST1000DM010) has an impressive performance profile. With Sequential read/writes averaging 173 and 159 MBps respectively, the Barracuda can make short work of even moderately large backups. The small file (4K) performance profile is less impressive but still adequate with average read/writes coming in at 0.87 and 1.53 MBps respectively. For use as OS drives, rotational disks are quickly loosing market share to SSDs which offer orders of magnitude faster 4k read/write speeds. On the other hand cheap TLC based SSDs often have slower sustained write speeds than their rotational counterparts. Reasonably good overall performance can be achieved by using a TLC SSD to host the OS and a larger rotational drive such as the Barracuda for backups and media files. Larger capacity variants of this drive offer both better performance and better value for money. [Feb '17 HDrivePro]

Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 60GB $71

The Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 has a Sandforce controller coupled with MLC NAND. This combination produces mediocre results for an SSD but for a USB flash drive its small file 4K performance is staggering. Comparing the Ventura Ultra and Sandisk Extreme shows that for small file IO the Ventura is around 200% faster than the Extreme. The Extreme has faster peak write speeds but overall the Ultra leads by a whopping 72%. The Ultra is a great choice for hosting Operating Systems or for use as boot media (check mobo. compat.) where its small file performance and low access times will reduce load times by orders of magnitude. Thanks to its exceptionally reasonable pricing, the Ultra topples the Extreme as my top USB pick for both value for money AND overall performance. [May '14 USBFlashPro]

SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB $18

The benchmark scores for the SanDisk Extreme were stunning. Until now every flash drive we have tested has shown a serious weakness in the area of 4K random writes. The SanDisk Extreme achieved a 4K random write speed of 2.1 MB/s which was over three times faster than the best of the rest, unfortunately we were unable to get consistent measurements but 2.1 MB/s was towards at the lower end of the range (10.8 MB/s - 1.71 MB/s) we observed. We suspect the inconsistency relates to the way the controller batches page cleanup. The other benchmark observations were all consistent and to date this drive has the highest sequential read we have seen on a 16GB flash drive. The SanDisk Extreme has not been released in the UK. Our test unit had to be shipped from Hong Kong where we were able to purchase it at at an extremely reasonable price. We will update the price if/when the drive becomes officially available in the UK ... [Jul '12 USBFlashPro]
2,927,222 PCs tested.


19 secs agoGigabyte GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3Gunboat36%
19 secs agoAsrock H61M-HVSYacht48%
29 secs agoAlienware Area-51 R2Battleship43%
43 secs agoMicrosoft Surface 3Tree trunk51%
56 secs agoAsus MAXIMUS VIII HEROBattle cruiser79%
59 secs agoAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0Yacht51%
1 min agoGigabyte GA-970A-D3Speed boat57%
1 min agoAsus MAXIMUS VIII HEROBattleship54%
1 min agoZ170A KRAIT GAMING 3X (MS-7A...Battleship60%
1 min agoAcer Aspire R5-571TGJet ski64%
1 min agoDell Inspiron 7537Jet ski56%
2 mins agoGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3Tree trunk72%
2 mins agoIntel DH61BFYacht66%
2 mins agoAsus B150M-A/M.2Destroyer60%
2 mins agoMSI B75MA-P45 (MS-7798)Speed boat62%
2 mins agoGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3Yacht49%
2 mins agoMSI Z97 PC Mate(MS-7850)Battleship71%
2 mins agoAsus MAXIMUS VII HERONuclear submarine65%
2 mins agoHP CQ3358ILSail boat55%
2 mins agoAsus GL702VMDestroyer65%


  Nvidia GTX 960TWN-User, 46 secs ago.
  HyperX Savage 120GBUSA-User, 2 mins ago.
  Intel Core i7-7700KUSA-User, 2 mins ago.
  Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TBUSA-User, 3 mins ago.
  AMD Athlon II X4 860KFRA-User, 4 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 1060-6GBUSA-User, 4 mins ago.
  Flash Voyager GT 32GBLVA-User, 5 mins ago.
  AMD FX-9370USA-User, 5 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 750 TiAUT-User, 6 mins ago.
  Intel Core i5-7600HKG-User, 8 mins ago.
  Intel Core i7-7700Kmuumumu, 8 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 1050 TiJPN-User, 8 mins ago.
  Intel Core i5-6500THA-User, 8 mins ago.
  AMD Ryzen 7 1700XTHA-User, 13 mins ago.
  AMD Ryzen 7 1700XARG-User, 15 mins ago.
  Intel Core i5-6600KUSA-User, 17 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 1080USA-User, 18 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 980 TiMUS-User, 18 mins ago.

New Products

›  AMD Ryzen 7 1700XCPUPro, 1 day ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 1TBSSDrivePro, 17 days ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 512GBSSDrivePro, 17 days ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 256GBSSDrivePro, 17 days ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 128GBSSDrivePro, 17 days ago.
›  WD Blue 6TB (2015)HDrivePro, 30 days ago.
›  Barracuda 500GB (2016)HDrivePro, 30 days ago.
›  WD Black 4TB (2016)HDrivePro, 30 days ago.
›  WD Black 5TB (2015)HDrivePro, 30 days ago.
›  Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  Seagate IronWolf 1TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
›  Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)HDrivePro, 1 month ago.
The Best.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X $399Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
Intel Core i7-7700K $310AMD RX 480 $177Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $240Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $164
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $120SanDisk Extreme 32GB $26
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $650SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback