UserBenchmark

Speed test your PC in less than a minute.
235,064 Components     16,818,227 Benchmarks     1,776,763 Votes
USBCPU USBGPU USBSSD USBHDD RAMRAM USBUSB

Intel Core i7-7700K $339

The Core i7-7700K is Intel’s flagship Kaby Lake based CPU which is reported to have the same IPC as its predecessor, Skylake. Comparing the 7700K and 6700K shows that both average effective speed and peak overclocked speed are up by 7%. Most of the increase in average effective speed is explained by the 5% boost in base clocks from 4.0 to 4.2 GHz. The improved peak lab speed is attributable to a combination of better overclocking capacity and improvements in Intel’s speedshift technology which make the 7700K slightly more responsive. Kaby Lake also has marginally better HD 630 integrated graphics. The i7-7700K is priced similarly to the i7-6700K so for top end gaming and workstation builds, the 7700K is the clear choice for 2017. AMD’s Ryzen will release later this year so things could change at that time. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $320

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $215

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

AMD RX 480 $210

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $140

The 256GB Samsung 850 Pro is the fastest consumer SSD we have seen to date. Thanks to Samsung's new 3D V-NAND the 850 Pro has lower power consumption and better performance, albeit marginally, than both the 840 Evo and 840 Pro. Looking at the benchmark figures for the 840 and 850 Pros shows that the effective performance improvement is 10% whereas the 850 Pro beats the 840 Evo by 16%. These drives effectively saturate SATA 3.0 making it difficult to distinguish between them in day-to-day use. At current prices the 850 Pro is prohibitively expensive, prices need to drop by 15% before it approaches the 840 Pro from a value perspective. Samsung may release a value orientated 850 Evo soon, but for now "most" users are better off with the 840 Pro. [Oct '14 SSDrivePro]

Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100

The 250GB Samsung 850 Evo has a similar architecture to its hugely successful predecessor, the 840 Evo. Both drives are TLC based but the 850 uses 3D V-NAND as opposed to regular NAND. Both drives also feature a Turbowrite cache (TWC) which buffers up to 3GB of writes. The TWC enables high burst write speeds but when the cache exhausts write speeds drop to 300 MB/s. Comparing the 850 and 840 Evos shows that effective speed, has improved by 11% and the warranty has been extended from three to five years but prices are also up by 11%. The 850 Evo does put in superb benchmarks (second only to the 850 Pro) but these are only valid within the TWC. At current price levels the 850 Evo struggles to compete with the value leaders[Dec '14 SSDrivePro]

Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90

The new 3TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST3000DM008) replaces its hugely successful predecessor, the 3TB Barracuda 7200.14 2011 (ST3000DM001). Comparing performance between the two models shows that the newer drive has 12% faster sequential speeds, comparable 4K speeds, improved mixed sequential speed and reduced mixed 4K speed. Overall, the effective speed is 12% faster on the 2016 model. Since there is normally little price difference between the two models the 2016 version is the clear winner especially for use as a backup drive with its impressive sequential read and write speeds of nearly 200 MBps. See the current value leaders here[Feb '17 HDrivePro]

Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50

The 1TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST1000DM010) has an impressive performance profile. With Sequential read/writes averaging 173 and 159 MBps respectively, the Barracuda can make short work of even moderately large backups. The small file (4K) performance profile is less impressive but still adequate with average read/writes coming in at 0.87 and 1.53 MBps respectively. For use as OS drives, rotational disks are quickly loosing market share to SSDs which offer orders of magnitude faster 4k read/write speeds. On the other hand cheap TLC based SSDs often have slower sustained write speeds than their rotational counterparts. Reasonably good overall performance can be achieved by using a TLC SSD to host the OS and a larger rotational drive such as the Barracuda for backups and media files. Larger capacity variants of this drive offer both better performance and better value for money. [Feb '17 HDrivePro]

Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 60GB $62

The Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 has a Sandforce controller coupled with MLC NAND. This combination produces mediocre results for an SSD but for a USB flash drive its small file 4K performance is staggering. Comparing the Ventura Ultra and Sandisk Extreme shows that for small file IO the Ventura is around 200% faster than the Extreme. The Extreme has faster peak write speeds but overall the Ultra leads by a whopping 72%. The Ultra is a great choice for hosting Operating Systems or for use as boot media (check mobo. compat.) where its small file performance and low access times will reduce load times by orders of magnitude. Thanks to its exceptionally reasonable pricing, the Ultra topples the Extreme as my top USB pick for both value for money AND overall performance. [May '14 USBFlashPro]

SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB $18

The benchmark scores for the SanDisk Extreme were stunning. Until now every flash drive we have tested has shown a serious weakness in the area of 4K random writes. The SanDisk Extreme achieved a 4K random write speed of 2.1 MB/s which was over three times faster than the best of the rest, unfortunately we were unable to get consistent measurements but 2.1 MB/s was towards at the lower end of the range (10.8 MB/s - 1.71 MB/s) we observed. We suspect the inconsistency relates to the way the controller batches page cleanup. The other benchmark observations were all consistent and to date this drive has the highest sequential read we have seen on a 16GB flash drive. The SanDisk Extreme has not been released in the UK. Our test unit had to be shipped from Hong Kong where we were able to purchase it at at an extremely reasonable price. We will update the price if/when the drive becomes officially available in the UK ... [Jul '12 USBFlashPro]
3,501,187 PCs tested.

PC
Score 

PC
Status
4 secs agoHP COMPAQ 8200 SFFYacht44%
27 secs agoDell Precision Tower 3620Battleship42%
30 secs agoAsus STRIX Z270F GAMINGBattleship56%
32 secs agoAsus M5A97 LE R2.0Yacht47%
36 secs agoMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)Battleship63%
36 secs agoZ170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)Raft26%
46 secs agoAsrock Z270 Gaming-ITX/acNuclear submarine57%
1 min agoAsrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0Surfboard17%
1 min agoLenovo 80V5Gunboat67%
2 mins agoAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0Gunboat29%
2 mins agoAsus MAXIMUS VIII HEROUFO73%
2 mins agoGigabyte GA-Z77X-UP4 THYacht74%
2 mins agoAsrock Z87 Extreme4Aircraft carrier64%
3 mins agoGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3Destroyer39%
4 mins agoAsus Z170-PGunboat42%
4 mins agoAsrock Z87 Pro3Aircraft carrier89%
4 mins agoAsrock FM2A68M-HD+Yacht62%
4 mins agoAsus P8P67 DELUXEDestroyer34%
4 mins agoBiostar Z170GT7UFO54%
4 mins agoGA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CFBattleship81%

Votes

›  AMD RX 550GPUPro, 4 days ago.
›  AMD RX 570GPUPro, 6 days ago.
›  AMD RX 580GPUPro, 8 days ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1400CPUPro, 18 days ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1500XCPUPro, 18 days ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1600XCPUPro, 18 days ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1600CPUPro, 28 days ago.
›  Nvidia GTX 1080 TiGPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1700CPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1800XCPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1700XCPUPro, 2 month ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 1TBSSDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 512GBSSDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 256GBSSDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 128GBSSDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  WD Blue 6TB (2015)HDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  Barracuda 500GB (2016)HDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  WD Black 4TB (2016)HDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  WD Black 5TB (2015)HDrivePro, 2 months ago.

New Products

›  AMD RX 550GPUPro, 4 days ago.
›  AMD RX 570GPUPro, 6 days ago.
›  AMD RX 580GPUPro, 8 days ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1400CPUPro, 18 days ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1500XCPUPro, 18 days ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1600XCPUPro, 18 days ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 5 1600CPUPro, 28 days ago.
›  Nvidia GTX 1080 TiGPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1700CPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1800XCPUPro, 1 month ago.
›  AMD Ryzen 7 1700XCPUPro, 2 month ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 1TBSSDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 512GBSSDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 256GBSSDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  Adata Ultimate SU800 128GBSSDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  WD Blue 6TB (2015)HDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  Barracuda 500GB (2016)HDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  WD Black 4TB (2016)HDrivePro, 2 months ago.
›  WD Black 5TB (2015)HDrivePro, 2 months ago.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $339Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $229AMD RX 480 $210Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $140
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $320Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $215Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $175
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $137SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback