UserBenchmark

Speed test your PC in less than a minute.
99,377 Components     5,219,255 Benchmarks     845,652 Votes
USBCPU USBGPU USBSSD USBHDD RAMRAM USBUSB

Intel Core i7-6700K $340

The Core i7-6700K is Intel's latest "Skylake" flagship processor. It replaces the hugely successful i7-4790K and takes the crown as the fastest mainstream consumer CPU available. Comparing performance and specs between the 4790K and 6700K shows that the configuration is largely unchanged (same base clocks, cores, threads) but the improved manufacturing process (14nm) brings a small reduction in TDP and a performance improvement of 8%; almost exactly the same jump as between the Ivy Bridge 3770K and Haswell 4770K. Owners of any unlocked-K Intel CPU from Sandy Bridge or onwards still have no real reason to upgrade as the performance improvements are largely academic but the i7-6700K will be the CPU of choice for the vast majority of top end PC builds in 2015. [Aug '15 CPUPro]

Intel Core i5-6600K $220

The Intel Core i5-6600K is based on the new "Skylake" 14nm manufacturing process. Sporting 4 physical cores with base/turbo clocks of 3.5/3.9 GHz the 6600K and its predecessor, the 4690K share the same basic configuration and disappointingly, offer similar performance. Comparing the 6600K and 6700K shows that the 6700K has faster multi and single core performance. The improved multi core performance is due to Hyperthreading which is the key differentiator for the i7-6700K. The gap in single core performance can largely be eliminated by overclocking the i5-6600K so although the stock effective speed is significantly higher on the 6700K, this gap diminishes significantly when both processors are overclocked. At a 30% discount, the 6600K is the better value gaming CPU. [Aug '15 CPUPro]

Nvidia GTX 980 Ti $570

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

Nvidia GTX 970 $265

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $118

The 256GB Samsung 850 Pro is the fastest consumer SSD we have seen to date. Thanks to Samsung's new 3D V-NAND the 850 Pro has lower power consumption and better performance, albeit marginally, than both the 840 Evo and 840 Pro. Looking at the performance figures for the 840 and 850 Pros shows that the effective performance improvement is 10% whereas the 850 Pro beats the 840 Evo by 16%. All of these drives effectively saturate SATA 3.0 making it near impossible to distinguish between them in day-to-day use. At current prices the 256GB 850 Pro is prohibitively expensive, prices need to drop by 15% before it approaches the 840 Pro from a value perspective. Samsung may release a value orientated 850 Evo soon, but for now "most" users are better off with the 840 Pro. [Oct '14 SSDrivePro]

Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88

The 250GB Samsung 850 Evo has a similar architecture to its older, and hugely successful 840 sibling. Both drives utilize TLC NAND and both sport a high speed Turbowrite cache (TWC) which buffers up to 3GB of writes. The TWC enables high burst write speeds but when the cache exhausts speeds drop to 300 MB/s. Comparing the 850 and 840 Evos shows that effective speed, has improved by 11% and the warranty has been extended from three to five years but prices are also up by 11%. The 250GB 850 Evo does put in superb benchmarks (second only to the 850 Pro) but these are only valid within the TWC. Users looking for more consistent performance should look elsewhere. At current price levels the 850 Evo struggles to compete with the value leaders[Dec '14 SSDrivePro]

WD Black 1TB (2013) $74

This is the most recent version (2013 FZEX) of Western Digital's best performing consumer storage drive, its predecessor was the WD1002FAEX which is now four years old. With average sequential read/write speeds of 150 MB/s this version outperforms its predecessor by a whopping 50%. Small file random 4K speeds have remained broadly unchanged with average read/write rates of 0.9/2.19 MB/s. Overall the 2013 WD Black has a very good performance profile and it also represents reasonable value for money, at least in the 1TB category. There are some good alternatives to the 2013 Black including the 2012 Blue. Looking at the 2013 Black vs 2012 Blue shows that both drives have similar performance. Power consumption (6.8/6.1 Watts active/idle) and noise levels (29.5 dBA) are also identical making it a tough call between the two. There is however, as always, better value amongst the larger capacities. [Feb '14 HDrivePro]

Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50

The 1TB Barracuda 7200.14 boasts impressive peak sequential read/write Lab speeds of 195/193 MB/s. These best case burst speeds indicate what the Barracuda is capable of under Lab perfect test conditions. Our real world benchmarks have been sourced from hundreds of users and give a better sense of how well this drive actually performs on a day to day basis. The 1TB 7200.14 has an average UBM sequential read/write speed of 147 MB/s, which is a superb result, especially for a budget drive. With 4K random read/write speeds of 0.77/1.53 MB/s small file performance is also respectable making the 1TB Barracuda a very good all round performer. In terms of value for money the relatively small 1TB drive is not as good value as its larger 3TB sibling but in the 1 TB category this is one of the best value for money drives available. [Jan '14 HDrivePro]

Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 60GB $51

The Mushkin Ventura Ultra USB 3.0 has a Sandforce controller coupled with MLC NAND. This combination produces mediocre results for an SSD but for a USB flash drive its small file 4K performance is staggering. Comparing the Ventura Ultra and Sandisk Extreme shows that for small file IO the Ventura is around 200% faster than the Extreme. The Extreme has faster peak write speeds but overall the Ultra leads by a whopping 72%. The Ultra is a great choice for hosting Operating Systems or for use as boot media (check mobo. compat.) where its small file performance and low access times will reduce load times by orders of magnitude. Thanks to its exceptionally reasonable pricing, the Ultra topples the Extreme as my top USB pick for both value for money AND overall performance. [May '14 USBFlashPro]

SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB $15

The benchmark scores for the SanDisk Extreme were stunning. Until now every flash drive we have tested has shown a serious weakness in the area of 4K random writes. The SanDisk Extreme achieved a 4K random write speed of 2.1 MB/s which was over three times faster than the best of the rest, unfortunately we were unable to get consistent measurements but 2.1 MB/s was towards at the lower end of the range (10.8 MB/s - 1.71 MB/s) we observed. We suspect the inconsistency relates to the way the controller batches page cleanup. The other benchmark observations were all consistent and to date this drive has the highest sequential read we have seen on a 16GB flash drive. The SanDisk Extreme has not been released in the UK. Our test unit had to be shipped from Hong Kong where we were able to purchase it at at an extremely reasonable price. We will update the price if/when the drive becomes officially available in the UK ... [Jul '12 USBFlashPro]
1,160,907 PCs tested.

PC
Score 

PC
Status
14 secs agoAsus Z97-AAircraft carrier48%
1 min agoAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0Gunboat55%
1 min agoGigabyte GA-B85M-D3HYacht55%
1 min agoZ170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)UFO78%
1 min agoGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7Battleship22%
2 mins agoAsus A88X-PROYacht59%
4 mins agoAsus M5A78L-M/USB3Yacht63%
4 mins agoAsrock Z170 Pro4/D3Battleship54%
4 mins agoAsrock H97M Pro4Surfboard23%
4 mins agoAsrock Z77 ProfessionalBattle cruiser26%
5 mins agoZ170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)Tree trunk99%
5 mins agoAsrock Z87 Extreme4Battle cruiser45%
6 mins agoHP Z840 WorkstationTree trunk53%
6 mins agoAsus P4P800SETree trunk63%
6 mins agoZ170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977)UFO75%
6 mins agoAsus M5A78L-M/USB3Yacht59%
8 mins agoGateway DX4860Battle cruiser39%
9 mins agoMSI Z97 U3 PLUS (MS-7922)Surfboard12%
9 mins agoGigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI-CFNuclear submarine78%
9 mins agoBiostar A780L3LTree trunk28%

Votes

  Nvidia Quadro K620MYS-User, 2 mins ago.
  Barracuda 7200.14 1TBGBR-User, 2 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 750 TiFRA-User, 7 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 970FRA-User, 7 mins ago.
  Intel Core i7-4790KUSA-User, 8 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 750 TiJPN-User, 9 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 950COL-User, 10 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 750 TiKAZ-User, 13 mins ago.
  Intel Core i7-6700KTheGodEye, 13 mins ago.
  Samsung 850 Evo 250GBCAN-User, 14 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 960USA-User, 14 mins ago.
  Samsung 850 Pro 512GBGBR-User, 18 mins ago.
  Crucial MX100 256GBPHL-User, 22 mins ago.
  HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)USA-User, 24 mins ago.
  AMD R9 380XUSA-User, 28 mins ago.
  Nvidia GTX 970USA-User, 28 mins ago.
  AMD R7 360PoorboiXD, 30 mins ago.
  Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TBChris8508, 46 mins ago.

New Products

›  Laptop SSHD 2.5" (32GB NAND)...HDrivePro, 13 days ago.
›  Zotac Premium Edition 480GBSSDrivePro, 14 days ago.
›  Zotac Premium Edition 240GBSSDrivePro, 14 days ago.
›  Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8G...RAMPro, 14 days ago.
›  Toshiba E300 3TBHDrivePro, 15 days ago.
›  Toshiba E300 2TBHDrivePro, 15 days ago.
›  Toshiba X300 6TBHDrivePro, 15 days ago.
›  Toshiba X300 5TBHDrivePro, 15 days ago.
›  Toshiba X300 4TBHDrivePro, 15 days ago.
›  Toshiba P300 3TBHDrivePro, 15 days ago.
›  Toshiba P300 2TBHDrivePro, 15 days ago.
›  Toshiba P300 1TBHDrivePro, 15 days ago.
›  Fury DDR4 1866 C10 2x4GBRAMPro, 18 days ago.
›  Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBRAMPro, 20 days ago.
›  Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 ...RAMPro, 20 days ago.
›  Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GBRAMPro, 20 days ago.
›  Mushkin Reactor 512GBSSDrivePro, 21 days ago.
›  Mushkin Reactor 1TBSSDrivePro, 21 days ago.
›  SanDisk Ultra II 960GBSSDrivePro, 21 days ago.
ADVERTISEMENT
Share page
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-6700K $340Nvidia GTX 970 $265Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i5-6600K $220Nvidia GTX 980 Ti $570Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $118
Intel Core i7-4790K $303AMD R9 380 $180Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $59SanDisk Extreme 64GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $21
WD Black 2TB (2013) $122G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 16GB $15
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback